References
Abowitz, K. K., & Stitzlein, S. M. (2018). Public schools, public
goods, and public work. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(3),
33–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721718808262
Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The
Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422–436.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040968
Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Preferences for redistribution
in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics,
89(5-6), 897–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.009
Ball, S. (2004). Education for sale! The commodification of
everything? https://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/education-sale-the-commodification-everything
Bartram, D. (2023). Does belief in meritocracy increase with inequality?
A reconsideration for european countries. The British Journal of
Sociology, 74(5), 763–780. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13042
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical
analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed). The
University of Chicago Press.
Bellei, C. (2025). El problema de la educación en Chile.
Debate. https://aldebaranlibros.cl/tienda/el-problema-de-la-educacion-en-chile/
Boccardo, G. (2020). 30 años de privatizaciones en chile: Lo que la
pandemia reveló. Nodo XXI.
Bourdieu, P. (2019). La Reproducción: Elementos para una Teoría Del
Sistema Educativo. Siglo XXI Editores.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). Schooling in capitalist
america: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic
life. Haymarket Books.
Brancaleone, D., & O’Brien, S. (2011). Educational commodification
and the (economic) sign value of learning outcomes. British Journal
of Sociology of Education, 32(4), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2011.578435
Busemeyer, M. R. (2012). Inequality and the political economy of
education: An analysis of individual preferences in OECD countries.
Journal of European Social Policy, 22(3), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928712440200
Busemeyer, M. R. (2013). Education funding and individual preferences
for redistribution. European Sociological Review,
29(6), 1122–1133. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcs085
Busemeyer, M. R., & Iversen, T. (2020). The welfare state with
private alternatives: The transformation of popular support for social
insurance. The Journal of Politics, 82(2), 671–686. https://doi.org/10.1086/706980
C. Palomino, J., & Sebastian, R. (2026). Wealth inequality and
preferences in the design of a wealth tax: An information-provision
experiment in the UK and spain. INET Oxford Working Papers,
2026-16. https://ideas.repec.org//p/amz/wpaper/2026-16.html
Castillo, J. C., Canales-Sellés, R., Laffert, A., & Urzúa, T.
(2026). Justification trajectories for pension inequality in chile
(2016–2023): The role of social class and beliefs in meritocracy.
Frontiers in Sociology, 11, 1771856. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2026.1771856
Castillo, J. C., Iturra, J., & Carrasco, K. (2025). Changes in the
justification of educational inequalities: The role of perceptions of
inequality and meritocracy during the COVID pandemic. Social Justice
Research, 38(3), 240–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-025-00458-0
Castillo, J. C., Iturra, J., Maldonado, L., Atria, J., & Meneses, F.
(2023). A multidimensional approach for measuring meritocratic
beliefs: Advantages, limitations and alternatives to the ISSP social
inequality survey. 53(6). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00207659.2023.2274712
Castillo, J. C., Laffert, A., Carrasco, K., & Iturra-Sanhueza, J.
(2025). Perceptions of inequality and meritocracy: Their interplay in
shaping preferences for market justice in chile (2016–2023).
Frontiers in Sociology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1634219
Castles, F. G., Leibfried, S., Lewis, J., Obinger, H., & Pierson, C.
(Eds.). (2010). The oxford handbook of the welfare state (1st
ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199579396.001.0001
Cech, E. A., & Blair-Loy, M. (2010). Perceiving glass ceilings?
Meritocratic versus structural explanations of gender inequality among
women in science and technology. Social Problems,
57(3), 371–397. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2010.57.3.371
Chancel, L., Gómez-Carrera, R., Moshrif, R., & Piketty, T. (Eds.).
(2026). World Inequality Report 2026. World Inequality Lab. https://wir2026.wid.world/
Clycq, N., Ward Nouwen, M. A., & Vandenbroucke, A. (2014).
Meritocracy, deficit thinking and the invisibility of the system:
Discourses on educational success and failure. British Educational
Research Journal, 40(5), 796–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3109
Corvalán, J., Carrasco, A., & García-Huidobro, J. E. (2016).
Mercado escolar: Libertad, diversidad y desigualdad. Ediciones
UC.
Darnon, C., Smeding, A., & Redersdorff, S. (2018). Belief in school
meritocracy as an ideological barrier to the promotion of equality.
European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 523–534.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2347
Duru-Bellat, M., & Tenret, E. (2012). Who’s for meritocracy?
Individual and contextual variations in the faith. Comparative
Education Review, 56(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1086/661290
Esping-Andersen, G. (1985). Politics against markets: The social
democratic road to power. Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1m322zp
Flores, I., Sanhueza, C., Atria, J., & Mayer, R. (2020). Top incomes
in chile: A historical perspective on income inequality, 1964–2017.
Review of Income and Wealth, 66(4), 850–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12441
Fourcade, M., & Healy, K. (2007). Moral views of market society.
Annual Review of Sociology, 33(Volume 33, 2007),
285–311. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131642
Freire, P. (2015). Pedagogía del oprimido (J. Mellado, Trans.;
4a edición argentina, corregida y revisada). Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
García-Sánchez, E., Van der Toorn, J., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., &
Willis, G. B. (2019). The vicious cycle of economic inequality: The role
of ideology in shaping the relationship between “what is”
and “what ought to be” in 41 countries. Social
Psychological and Personality Science, 10(8), 991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618811500
Heuer, J.-O., Lux, T., Mau, S., & Zimmermann, K. (2020).
Legitimizing inequality: The moral repertoires of meritocracy in four
countries. Comparative Sociology, 19(4-5), 542–584. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-BJA10017
Immergut, E. M., & Schneider, S. M. (2020). Is it unfair for the
affluent to be able to purchase “better” healthcare?
Existential standards and institutional norms in healthcare attitudes
across 28 countries. Social Science & Medicine,
267, 113146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113146
Kluegel, J. R., Mason, D. S., & Wegener, B. (1999). The legitimation
of capitalism in the postcommunist transition public opinion about
market justice, 1991—1996. European Sociological Review,
15(3), 251–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018263
Kluegel, J., & Smith, E. (1981). Beliefs about stratification.
Annual Review of Sociology, 7(Volume 7, 1981), 29–56.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.07.080181.000333
Koos, S., & Sachweh, P. (2019). The moral economies of market
societies: Popular attitudes towards market competition, redistribution
and reciprocity in comparative perspective. Socio-Economic
Review, 17(4), 793–821. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwx045
Lane, R. E. (1986). Market justice, political justice. American
Political Science Review, 80(2), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958264
Langsæther, P. E., & Evans, G. (2020). More than self‐interest: Why
different classes have different attitudes to income inequality. The
British Journal of Sociology, 71(4), 594–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12747
Lee, J.-S., & Stacey, M. (2024). Fairness perceptions of educational
inequality: The effects of self-interest and neoliberal orientations.
The Australian Educational Researcher, 51(4),
1215–1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00636-6
Lindh, A. (2015). Public opinion against markets? Attitudes towards
market distribution of social services – a comparison of 17 countries.
Social Policy & Administration, 49(7), 887–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12105
Lindh, A. (2017). Is it just that people with higher incomes can buy
better education and health care? 57225, 17, 69–80.
Linzer, D. A., & Lewis, J. B. (2011). poLCA: An r package for
polytomous variable latent class analysis. Journal of Statistical
Software, 42, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i10
Liu, C., & Wang, J. (2026). Does education legitimise inequality?
Comparative analysis of income inequality, education, and meritocratic
beliefs. The British Journal of Sociology, 77(1),
5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.70029
Madariaga, A. (2020). The three pillars of neoliberalism: Chile’s
economic policy trajectory in comparative perspective. Contemporary
Politics, 26(3), 308–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2020.1735021
Mau, S. (2015). Inequality, marketization and the majority class:
Why did the european middle classes accept neo-liberalism?
Springer.
Mijs, J. J. B. (2016). The unfulfillable promise of meritocracy: Three
lessons and their implications for justice in education. Social
Justice Research, 29(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0228-0
Mijs, J. J. B. (2018). Inequality is a problem of inference: How people
solve the social puzzle of unequal outcomes. Societies,
8(3), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030064
Mijs, J. J. B. (2021). The paradox of inequality: Income inequality and
belief in meritocracy go hand in hand. Socio-Economic Review,
19(1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy051
Moyano, C. (2020). Justicia educacional : desafíos para las ideas,
las instituciones y las prácticas en la educación chilena. https://www.torrossa.com/it/resources/an/5498882
Nye, J. V., Bryukhanov, M., Litman, C., & Polyachenko, S. (2026).
Education and market liberal preferences. Journal of Economic
Behavior & Organization, 241, 107387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107387
Nylund-Gibson, K., & Choi, A. Y. (2018). Ten frequently asked
questions about latent class analysis. Translational Issues in
Psychological Science, 4(4), 440–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000176
OECD. (2025). Education at a glance 2025: OECD indicators. OECD
Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1c0d9c79-en
Piketty, T., & Sandel, M. J. (2025). Equality: What it means and
why it matters. Polity Press.
PNUD. (2017). Desiguales: Origenes, cambios y desafíos de la brecha
social en chile.
Ramos, M. (Ed.). (2022). Educación: La promesa incumplida.
Catalonia.
Satz, D. (2010). Why some things should not be for sale: The moral
limits of markets. Oxford University Press.
Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American
Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818907
Sin, P., Son Hing, L. S., Pereira, S., & Gill, H. (2026). They work
hard for their money…or do they? The role of meritocracy beliefs on
evaluations of pay dispersion. Social Justice Research,
39(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-025-00469-x
Valenzuela, J. P., Bellei, C., & Ríos, D. de los. (2014).
Socioeconomic school segregation in a market-oriented educational
system. The case of chile. Journal of Education Policy,
29(2), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.806995
Van Hootegem, A. (2022). Worlds of distributive justice preferences:
Individual- and country-level profiles of support for equality, equity
and need. Social Science Research, 106, 102721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102721
Van Noord, J., Spruyt, B., Kuppens, T., & Spears, R. (2019).
Education-based status in comparative perspective: The legitimization of
education as a basis for social stratification. Social Forces,
98(2), 649–676. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz012
Walzer, M. (2010). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and
equality (Nachdr.). Basic Books.
Xian, H., & Reynolds, J. (2017). Bootstraps, buddies, and bribes:
Perceived meritocracy in the united states and china. The
Sociological Quarterly, 58(4), 622–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1331719
Young, M. (2017). The rise of the meritocracy (2nd ed.).
Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134642
Zhu, L. (2025). Meritocratic beliefs in the united states, finland, and
china: A multidimensional approach using latent class analysis. The
British Journal of Sociology, 76(1), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13152